NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 2x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 336
• 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 782

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 119

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 336
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 164
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 782

Compare specifications (specs)