NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 28 March 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 43.2 billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 432.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 769 vs 716
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 366 vs 119
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 769 vs 716 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 vs 119 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK208B | G92 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 28 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1297 | 438 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1688 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
SLI |