NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3329
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 954 MHz
• 3.5x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• 4.7x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 716
• 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 119
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 3722
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 8.358
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 157.606
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.843
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 15.374
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 40.443
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1598
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3636
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1598
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3636

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 117

Compare specifications (specs)