NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x better floating-point performance: 602.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1068 vs 716
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 119
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3954 vs 3722
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1598
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3636
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1598
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3636
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 385 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 vs 716 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 vs 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3636 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 vs 326 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 | 716 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | 326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GK208B |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1001 | 1297 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |