NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 625 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
Around 25% better floating-point performance: 602.1 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.9x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 62 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1080 vs 974
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1453
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3447
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1453
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3447

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 March 2016 vs 5 October 2011
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate	28.22 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 192
Floating-point performance	602.1 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	16 Watt vs 62 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1080 vs 974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1764 vs 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3691 vs 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1764 vs 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3691 vs 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 151

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	326 vs 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	3921 vs 3912

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

974

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

151

326

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3912

3921

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1764

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3691

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1764

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3691

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3353

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	1080	974
PassMark - G2D Mark	151	326
Geekbench - OpenCL	3912	3921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1764	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3691	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1764	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3691	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.168

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM108	GF106
Launch date	25 March 2016	5 October 2011
Place in performance rating	1035	1121
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$209
Value for money (0-100)		7.27
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	625 MHz
Floating-point performance	602.1 gflops	480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	256	192
Texture fill rate	28.22 GTexel / s	20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	16 Watt	62 Watt
Transistor count		1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		178 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers