NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs NVIDIA GRID K2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA GRID K2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 vs 18.948
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 312
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• 9.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 512
• 4.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 2109
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 240
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 8099
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 380.461
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.988
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 31.027
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 107.094
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2961
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2961

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2109 2737
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 319
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8099 10550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.633 18.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	380.461 968.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.988 2.58
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.027 32.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.094 114.144
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2961 6371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 312
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2961 6371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 312

Compare specifications (specs)