NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs NVIDIA GeForce G105M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G102M and NVIDIA GeForce G105M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M

  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 22
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 63
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 59 vs 22
PassMark - G3D Mark 168 vs 63

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M

  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz vs 400 MHz
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1314 vs 890
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1314 vs 890
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
Memory clock speed 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1314 vs 890
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1314 vs 890

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G105M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
59
22
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
168
63
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
890
1314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
890
1314
Name NVIDIA GeForce G102M NVIDIA GeForce G105M
PassMark - G2D Mark 59 22
PassMark - G3D Mark 168 63
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 890 1314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 890 1314
Geekbench - OpenCL 2534

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce G102M NVIDIA GeForce G105M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name MCP79MX G98
Launch date 8 January 2009 8 January 2009
Place in performance rating 1617 1665
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1600 MHz
CUDA cores 16 8
Gigaflops 48 38
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 210 million 210 million
Floating-point performance 25.6 gflops
Pipelines 8
Texture fill rate 5.12 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 1.0 PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 9.0c 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 2.1

Memory

Memory bandwidth 6.4 GB / s 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3)
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 400 MHz 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory type GDDR2 GDDR3

Technologies

CUDA
Power management 8.0 8.0