NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM and NVIDIA NVS 5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 187.49 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 470 vs 200
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 6549

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 540 MHz
• Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 43 Watt
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 62 vs 59
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2747 vs 2502
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 2502

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5100M

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	59 62
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	470 200
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8132 6549
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2502 2747
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2502 2747

Compare specifications (specs)