NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 2x 8
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 394 vs 121
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 658
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 658
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 20 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 2x 8 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 394 vs 121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 vs 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.0 billion / sec
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 88
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.0 billion / sec |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 88 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 394 | 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.426 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 | 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G98 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1516 | 1519 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 6.0 billion / sec | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | (G)DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |