NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 550 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 versus 1926
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 versus 2569
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 versus 1926
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 versus 2569
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 550 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 versus 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 versus 2569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 versus 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 versus 2569 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.6 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 422.4 gflops versus 311.04 gflops
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 versus 771
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 versus 227
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3411 versus 2617
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.306 versus 6.139
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.707 versus 171.053
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.855 versus 0.65
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.423 versus 9.729
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.158 versus 19.871
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 versus 1208
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 versus 1208
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.6 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 422.4 gflops versus 311.04 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 versus 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 versus 227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3411 versus 2617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 versus 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 versus 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 versus 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 versus 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 versus 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 versus 1208 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 778 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 227 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2617 | 3411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | 8.306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | 272.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | 0.855 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | 14.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | 27.158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 2569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 2569 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2011 | 13 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $46.56 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1351 | 1352 |
Prix maintenant | $69.99 | $46.56 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.03 | 25.92 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 550 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 311.04 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.0 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |