NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 62 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
• 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
• 2600x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 322
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 131
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 1283
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 2.471
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 vs 77.99
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.233
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 vs 6.018
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.02 vs 4.053
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 vs 555
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 vs 835
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 1155
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 vs 555
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 vs 835
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 1155

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	322 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	131 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1283 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.471 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.99 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.233 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.018 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.053 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	555 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	835 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1155 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	555 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	835 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1155 2668

Compare specifications (specs)