NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 625 MHz
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 62 Watt
| Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 versus 24 December 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 625 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 62 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 480.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops
- 2600x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 versus 322
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 versus 131
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 versus 1283
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 versus 2.471
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 versus 77.99
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 versus 0.233
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 versus 6.018
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.02 versus 4.053
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 versus 555
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 versus 835
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 versus 1155
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 versus 555
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 versus 835
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 versus 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 versus 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3879 versus 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 versus 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 versus 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 versus 1155 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 947 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 303 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | 3879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 10.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 258.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | 13.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | 19.02 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 2668 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF119 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 | 24 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | $599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1626 | 1287 |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $87.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | 17.65 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 178 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 2600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G100 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 600
