NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 224 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 vs 226
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 vs 105
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2141 vs 729
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.233 vs 2.282
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 vs 112.819
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.519 vs 0.276
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.151 vs 5.671
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 589
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1251
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1881
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 589
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1251
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1881

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 vs 16.605

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	432 226
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	126 105
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2141 729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.233 2.282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.144 112.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.519 0.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.151 5.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.605 23.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1881

Compare specifications (specs)