NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and AMD Radeon HD 6470M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 224 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 versus 226
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 versus 105
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2141 versus 729
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.233 versus 2.282
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 versus 112.819
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.519 versus 0.276
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.151 versus 5.671
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 versus 589
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 versus 1251
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1881
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 589
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 1251
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1881
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 4 January 2011 |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 224 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 versus 226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 versus 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 versus 729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 versus 2.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 versus 112.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 versus 0.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 versus 5.671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 versus 589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 versus 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1881 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6470M
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 160 versus 96
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 versus 16.605
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 160 versus 96 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.025 versus 16.605 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | AMD Radeon HD 6470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 | 226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 | 729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 2.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 112.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 5.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 23.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Seymour |
Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 4 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1500 | 1579 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $569.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $569.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 224 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 370 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |