NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 192 gflops
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 23 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 434 versus 396
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 versus 90
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2121 versus 1583
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.519 versus 0.426
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 versus 12.306
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 versus 737
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 737
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 192 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 23 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 434 versus 396 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 versus 90 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2121 versus 1583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 versus 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 versus 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 versus 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 737 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.329 versus 4.233
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.162 versus 161.144
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 1595
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 versus 2392
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 1595
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 2392
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 versus 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 versus 161.144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 versus 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 2392 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 434 | 396 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 90 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2121 | 1583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 4.329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 162.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2906 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2906 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1507 | 1510 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.0 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 420M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
