NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs ATI Radeon HD 5470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 479 vs 268
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 960
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 960
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1771
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1771

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470

• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 298 vs 141

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	479 268
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	141 298
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2333 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2333 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 1771
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 1771

Compare specifications (specs)