NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M versus AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 versus 473
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 versus 91
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2399 versus 1417
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 versus 2.47
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 210.901
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 2194
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3341
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 2194
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3341
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 17 February 2012 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 versus 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 versus 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2399 versus 1417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 versus 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 versus 210.901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- 5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 96
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 576.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Environ 65% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 versus 967
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 versus 967
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 versus 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 versus 967 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2399 | 1417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | 210.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 17 February 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1403 | 1404 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $629.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $629.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 480 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3, (GDDR5) |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |