NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 478
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 91
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 vs 2171
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 vs 4.85
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 195.796
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.561
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 vs 9.109
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 vs 16.727
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 960
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 2210
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2701
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 960
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 2210
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 253.4 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	532 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	152 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2387 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.055 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.004 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.393 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.903 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	967 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2766 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	967 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2766 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2701

Compare specifications (specs)