NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 versus 478
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 versus 91
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 versus 2171
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 versus 4.85
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 195.796
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.561
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 versus 9.109
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 versus 16.727
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 versus 960
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2701
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 versus 960
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 versus 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 versus 91 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 versus 2171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 versus 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 versus 195.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 versus 9.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 versus 16.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 versus 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 versus 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2701 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.05 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
| Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 | 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 91 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 | 2171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | 195.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | 9.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | 16.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1390 | 1503 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
