NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
2.1x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1087 vs 552
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 171
Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3056 vs 2565
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 5.332
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.635
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 10.932
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 800
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 800

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 22 March 2012
Pipelines	384 vs 144
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1087 vs 552
PassMark - G2D Mark	253 vs 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	3056 vs 2565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649 vs 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642 vs 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732 vs 10.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892 vs 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892 vs 800

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 174.555
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 vs 16.3
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 861
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1443
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 861
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1443

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	205.545 vs 174.555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.728 vs 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2418 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2418 vs 1443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

552

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

171

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3056

2565

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.649

5.332

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

174.555

205.545

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.642

0.635

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.732

10.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.3

22.728

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

800

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

2418

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

800

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

2418

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1087	552
PassMark - G2D Mark	253	171
Geekbench - OpenCL	3056	2565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649	5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555	205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732	10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.3	22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892	800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	861	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1443	2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892	800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	861	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1443	2418
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK107	GF116
Launch date	23 July 2013	22 March 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$109.94
Place in performance rating	1446	1449
Price now	$79
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	17.59
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops	253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	144
Texture fill rate	22.59 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,170 million
Boost clock speed		753 MHz
CUDA cores		Up to 144
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
API support
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	44.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11