NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE versus AMD FirePro V3900
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and AMD FirePro V3900 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 199 Watt
- Environ 74% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3140 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 versus 640
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2344 versus 1564
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.495 versus 4.646
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.649 versus 0.468
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 versus 1311
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 versus 1631
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 versus 1311
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 versus 1631
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 versus 7 February 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 199 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 versus 640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 versus 1564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 versus 4.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 versus 0.468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 versus 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 versus 1631 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V3900
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624.0 gflops versus 384.0 gflops
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 versus 173
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.435 versus 251.012
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.784 versus 13.333
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 58.58 versus 13.954
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3127
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3127
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops versus 384.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 versus 173 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 versus 251.012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 versus 13.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 versus 13.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V3900
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | AMD FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 1564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | 4.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | 279.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | 0.468 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | 13.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | 58.58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 3358 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | AMD FirePro V3900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 | 7 February 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1345 | 1347 |
| Prix maintenant | $849.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 199 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Facteur de forme | Half Height / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDFirePro V3900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
IntelUHD Graphics 610
