NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 7.2x better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2983 vs 1458
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5586 vs 1774
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 February 2013 vs 3 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2983 vs 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5586 vs 1774 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 32 Watt
- 30.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1458 vs 48.1
- 17.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1774 vs 99.8
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1458 vs 48.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1774 vs 99.8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.577 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 226.218 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2983 | 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5586 | 1774 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 28.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 48.1 | 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 99.8 | 1774 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 106 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GT216 |
Launch date | 3 February 2013 | 3 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1512 | 1509 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 40 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HybridPower | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |