NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 548
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 194
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1284
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1284

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 1946
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 6.705
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 100.391
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.441
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 8.146
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 20.64
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 977
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1833
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 977
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 548
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2264

Compare specifications (specs)