NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 12.361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 12.361 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 623
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 212
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 1946
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 6.705
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 100.391
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.441
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 8.146
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 977
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1494
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1833
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 977
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1494
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1833
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 192
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 vs 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 vs 192 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GK208B | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1359 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
Quick Sync |