NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 1699
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.399
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 vs 7.769
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 9.522
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 976
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1720
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 976
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1720
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 23 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 vs 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 vs 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 vs 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 1720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- 1782x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 623
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 212
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 6.705
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 111.269 vs 100.391
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 977
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 977
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 vs 212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 vs 100.391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 vs 977 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1720 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | GK107 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1450 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 797 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 160 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |