NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA NVS 510 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 versus 1699
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 versus 0.399
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 versus 7.769
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 9.522
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 976
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 versus 1720
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 976
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 1720
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 23 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 versus 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 versus 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 versus 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 versus 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 1720 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 510
- 1782x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 versus 623
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 versus 212
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 versus 6.705
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 111.269 versus 100.391
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 versus 977
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 versus 977
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 versus 212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 versus 100.391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 versus 977 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1720 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK208B | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | $449 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1450 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 797 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 160 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |