NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 625 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 62 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 19.02

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• 2600x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 623
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 212
• Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 1946
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 6.705
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 vs 100.391
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.441
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 vs 8.146
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 vs 977
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 vs 1494
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 1833
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 vs 977
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 vs 1494
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2668

Compare specifications (specs)