NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 192 vs 8
- 17.6x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 111
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 43
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 494
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 7 May 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 23 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 43 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- 1390x more memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
| Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 494 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GK208B | G98 |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 7 May 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $54.50 |
| Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1676 |
| Price now | $34.99 | $49.75 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | 2.51 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 540 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1390 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
