NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M versus NVIDIA Quadro 410
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA Quadro 410 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 271.1 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 38 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 648 versus 438
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3744 versus 1446
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 versus 5.393
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 151.304 versus 126.006
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 versus 5.685
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 8.847
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 versus 919
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 versus 1311
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 versus 1794
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 versus 919
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 versus 1311
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 1794
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 7 August 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 271.1 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 38 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 648 versus 438 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3744 versus 1446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 versus 5.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 versus 126.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 versus 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 8.847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 versus 919 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 versus 1794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 versus 919 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 1794 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 410
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 11.3 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 220 versus 129
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.3 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 220 versus 129 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 648 | 438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 220 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3744 | 1446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 5.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 126.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 8.847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 919 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 1794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 919 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 1794 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 7 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1461 | 1462 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $272.28 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 271.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9.2 GTexel / s | 11.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 38 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 176 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.26 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
