NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 15.3x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 630
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 314
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 vs 3210
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 vs 8.844
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 vs 171.17
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 vs 10.385
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 vs 12.361
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 988
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 988
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 vs 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 vs 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 vs 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 vs 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 vs 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 vs 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 vs 988 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 vs 194 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 64 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 1.023
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1427
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2153
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1427
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2153
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 1.023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 2153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GK107 | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Place in performance rating | 1270 | 1359 |
Price now | $94.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |