NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 15.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 versus 630
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 314
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 versus 3210
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 versus 8.844
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 versus 171.17
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 versus 10.385
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 versus 12.361
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 versus 988
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 versus 988
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 versus 988 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 42% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 1.023
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 1427
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 2153
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 1427
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 2153
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 1.023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 2153 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GK107 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1270 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |