NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3600 MHz
| Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 12 July 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 907.2 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2272 vs 1469
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 349
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7860 vs 4271
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.445 vs 11.994
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 291.627
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.823 vs 1.023
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.222 vs 15.139
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.61 vs 23.651
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 vs 1790
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2153
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 vs 1790
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2153
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 vs 1469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 vs 349 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7860 vs 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 vs 11.994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 vs 291.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 vs 1.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 vs 15.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 vs 23.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 vs 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 vs 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 2272 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 388 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 7860 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 21.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 617.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 27.222 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 40.61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 12 July 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 1270 | 917 |
| Price now | $94.99 | $89.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | 34.71 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 6-pin |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 768 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
