NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 vs 23.499
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 vs 23.499 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1469
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 349
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 4271
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 11.994
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 291.627
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 1.023
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 15.139
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1790
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1427
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2153
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1790
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1427
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2153
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 513
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 vs 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 vs 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 vs 15.139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 vs 513 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK106 |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 1270 | 1003 |
Price now | $94.99 | $144.81 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | 16.05 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |