NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 1002.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 versus 23.499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 versus 23.499 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 1469
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 349
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 4271
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 11.994
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 291.627
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 1.023
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 15.139
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1790
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1427
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 2153
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1790
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1427
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 2153
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 513
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 1469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 349 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 versus 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 11.994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 291.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 1.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 15.139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 2153 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 513 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | $109 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1270 | 1003 |
| Prix maintenant | $94.99 | $144.81 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | 16.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
