NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 31.78 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1469
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 349
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 4271
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 11.994
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 291.627
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.023
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 15.139
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 vs 23.651
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 1790
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 1427
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 2153
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 1790
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 1427
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 2153
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 513

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1469 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	349 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4271 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.994 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	291.627 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.023 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.139 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.651 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1790 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1427 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2153 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1790 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1427 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2153 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 1106

Compare specifications (specs)