NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 93% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 947
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 303
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 vs 3879
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 vs 10.229
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 vs 258.26
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 vs 0.885
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 vs 13.688
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 vs 19.02
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 1600
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 1600

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 64 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 vs 1427
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 2153
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 vs 1427
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 2153

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1469 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	349 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4271 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.994 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	291.627 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.023 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.139 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.651 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1790 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1427 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2153 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1790 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1427 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2153 2668

Compare specifications (specs)