NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA NVS 5200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 vs 507
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3866 vs 2130
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 vs 5.829
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.864 vs 0.539
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 vs 9.643
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 16.851
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 222
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 1099
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2715
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 222
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 1099
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2715

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1802 MHz
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 149
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 157.479

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5200M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	793 507
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	149 188
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3866 2130
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.392 5.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.479 189.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.864 0.539
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.101 9.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.77 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1589 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3235 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 2715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1589 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3235 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 2715

Compare specifications (specs)