NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M versus AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and AMD Radeon HD 7730M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 675 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1332 versus 778
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 215
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 15.244
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1777
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 3220
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1777
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 3220
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 675 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 versus 778 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 215 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 15.244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 3220 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6551 versus 4261
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.172 versus 251.09
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.524 versus 1.144
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.319 versus 10.872
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.757 versus 13.423
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6551 versus 4261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 versus 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.524 versus 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.757 versus 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 | 778 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 215 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4261 | 6551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | 15.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | 289.172 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | 1.524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | 25.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | 69.757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Chelsea |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1155 | 1157 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
