NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M und AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Etwa 29% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:941 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Etwa 24% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 967 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Etwa 65% höhere Texturfüllrate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Etwa 24% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 742.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1332 vs 943
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 14.771
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1759
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 2540
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1759
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 2540
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 941 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 967 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 742.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 vs 943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 vs 14.771 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 2540 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 281 vs 244
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5970 vs 4261
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 vs 251.09
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 vs 1.144
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 vs 10.872
- 5.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 13.423
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3334
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3334
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 281 vs 244 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5970 vs 4261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 vs 251.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 vs 1.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 vs 13.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3334 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 | 943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 281 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4261 | 5970 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | 24.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | 72.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | GK107 | Oland |
Startdatum | 9 January 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1155 | 1156 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 967 MHz | 780 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 941 MHz | 730 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 742.7 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 30.94 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |