NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
• 8.9x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 347
• 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2530 vs 538
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 vs 155.638
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.858 vs 7.36
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.753 vs 12.009
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 754
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 2392
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 754
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 144
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 2.692
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.55

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	551 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	144 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2530 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.692 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.29 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.55 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.858 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.753 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 2392

Compare specifications (specs)