NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 vs 462
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 175
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2485
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 vs 1 November 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 vs 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2485 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 106 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 | 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 175 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5036 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2485 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF106 | G92 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 | 1 November 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1144 | 1145 |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 Pro
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
