NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and AMD Radeon HD 7850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8368 vs 6173
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 6173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3696
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 567
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5119 vs 3885
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 5 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 vs 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 vs 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 567 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 vs 3885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 567 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 | 3885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 5 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 334 | 520 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $449.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,761 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
| Texture fill rate | 55.04 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 210 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
IntelArc A370M
