NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8368 vs 2408
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 2408
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3170
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3170
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 355
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5119 vs 1894
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 vs 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 vs 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 vs 1894 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 | 1894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Raven |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 23 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 334 | 931 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
IntelArc A370M
