NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 12.31 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- 8.2x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 228.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 143 Watt
- 12.8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 320 MB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1584 MHz
- 12.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 412
- 14.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 31
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 12 February 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 513 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 12.31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 228.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 143 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 320 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1584 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 31 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | 412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 31 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP107 | G80 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 12 February 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $269 |
| Place in performance rating | 586 | 1640 |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 513 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 228.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 12.31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 143 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 320 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 63.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1584 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
