NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD FirePro S7150

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 3208
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 27.544
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 570.969
• 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 0.687
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 23.637
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 6147
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 583
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 6147
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 583

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150

• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,911 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 292
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 vs 17437
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3721
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3721

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 3208
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 440
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17437 29623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 27.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 570.969
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 0.687
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 23.637
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 583

Compare specifications (specs)