NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 15.9x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
• 63.6x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 18.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 347
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 194
• 38.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 538
• 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 8.712
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 155.638
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 0.931
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 7.36
• 25.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 12.009
• 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2392
• 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2392

Compare specifications (specs)