NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1072 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1176 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1127
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 154
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 5982
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 25.98
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 168.449
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.307
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 21.837
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 101.399
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3065
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3065

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 66% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 1127
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 154
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 5982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 506

Compare specifications (specs)