NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 43.2 billion / sec
6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 432.1 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 140 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
8.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 769
Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 366

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 28 March 2008
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s vs 43.2 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 128
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops vs 432.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 140 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332 vs 769
PassMark - G2D Mark	650 vs 366

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX

Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 1392 MHz
157.1x more memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 7 GB/s

Core clock speed	1688 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz vs 7 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6332

769

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

650

366

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332	769
PassMark - G2D Mark	650	366
Geekbench - OpenCL	20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	305

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla
Code name	GP107	G92
Launch date	25 October 2016	28 March 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$299
Place in performance rating	487	438
Price now	$159.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	46.07
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	1688 MHz
CUDA cores	768	128
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	432.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	105 °C
Pipelines	768	128
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s	43.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	140 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
G-SYNC support
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s	70.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	1100 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
SLI