NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 2135
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 475
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 6108
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 24.117
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 335.835
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.651
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 97.126
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3309
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 24.676
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 2135
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 475
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 6108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 655

Compare specifications (specs)