NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1392 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 66.82 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,138 gflops versus 793.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 versus 2135
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 versus 475
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 6108
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 24.117
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 335.835
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 1.651
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 97.126
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 2918
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 3309
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 2918
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 3309
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops versus 793.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 versus 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 versus 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 257.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 24.676
- 2.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 24.676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GP107 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 487 | 979 |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |